vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armour Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) and Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.4M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.1× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Armour Residential REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 420.2% vs 7.0%, a 413.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Armour Residential REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (297.9% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Armour Residential REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.0% CAGR vs 17.1%).
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that primarily invests in agency residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. It focuses on generating consistent long-term net income for shareholders via strategic asset management and active interest rate risk mitigation.
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
ARR vs CMCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.4M | $46.9M |
| Net Profit | $211.7M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 420.2% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 297.9% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 555.9% | -33.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.43 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.5M |
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 420.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 413.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -366.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -693.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $2.43 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.91 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.3M | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $231.0M |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $339.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $231.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $220.3M |
| Q4 25 | $21.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $321.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.2M | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.59× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
