vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armour Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) and FLYEXCLUSIVE INC. (FLYX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLYEXCLUSIVE INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($92.1M vs $50.4M, roughly 1.8× Armour Residential REIT, Inc.). Armour Residential REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 420.2% vs -4.6%, a 424.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Armour Residential REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (297.9% vs 19.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Armour Residential REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.0% CAGR vs 21.9%).
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that primarily invests in agency residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. It focuses on generating consistent long-term net income for shareholders via strategic asset management and active interest rate risk mitigation.
FLYEXCLUSIVE INC. is a U.S.-headquartered private aviation services provider that offers private jet charter, aircraft management, maintenance repair, and fractional ownership programs. It primarily serves high-net-worth individuals, corporate clients, and government entities across North America, delivering personalized on-demand air travel solutions prioritizing safety and convenience.
ARR vs FLYX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.4M | $92.1M |
| Net Profit | $211.7M | $-4.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 420.2% | -4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 297.9% | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 555.9% | 32.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.43 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.5M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $91.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $88.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $79.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.0M |
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.4M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -34.3% |
| Q4 25 | 420.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 413.5% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.4% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -366.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -693.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | $2.43 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.91 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.3M | $18.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $123.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $-434.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $448.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $123.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $111.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $209.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $-434.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-261.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $-281.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-192.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $-149.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-149.5M |
| Q4 25 | $21.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4B | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | $443.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $466.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | $494.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $524.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.2M | $-209.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -12.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-51.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.8M | $-209.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $363.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.5M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $353.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-25.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-64.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -80.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.