vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armour Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $50.4M, roughly 1.9× Armour Residential REIT, Inc.). On growth, Armour Residential REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (297.9% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Armour Residential REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.0% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that primarily invests in agency residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. It focuses on generating consistent long-term net income for shareholders via strategic asset management and active interest rate risk mitigation.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
ARR vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.4M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $211.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 420.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 297.9% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 555.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.43 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.4M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.5M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.4M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 420.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 413.5% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -366.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -693.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.43 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.3M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.3M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $21.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.2M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.5M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARR
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
