vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armour Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.4M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.1× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). Armour Residential REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 420.2% vs -1.9%, a 422.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 297.9%).
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that primarily invests in agency residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. It focuses on generating consistent long-term net income for shareholders via strategic asset management and active interest rate risk mitigation.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
ARR vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.4M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $211.7M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | 420.2% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 297.9% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 555.9% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.43 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.4M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.5M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $12.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.4M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.4M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-31.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 420.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 413.5% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.4% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -366.8% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -693.8% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -256.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.43 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.95 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.3M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.0B | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $13.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.2M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.5M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $54.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARR
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
