vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fossil Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.2M vs $226.0M, roughly 1.2× Array Technologies, Inc.). Fossil Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -14.8% vs -64.5%, a 49.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Array Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-17.9% vs -21.1%). Array Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.2M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Array Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-6.0% CAGR vs -11.4%).
ATI Technologies Inc. was a Canadian semiconductor technology corporation based in Markham, Ontario, that specialized in the development of graphics processing units and chipsets. Founded in 1985, the company listed publicly in 1993 and was acquired by AMD in 2006. As a major fabless semiconductor company, ATI conducted research and development in-house and outsourced the manufacturing and assembly of its products. With the decline and eventual bankruptcy of 3dfx in 2000, ATI and its chief ri...
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
ARRY vs FOSL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $226.0M | $270.2M |
| Net Profit | $-145.7M | $-40.0M |
| Gross Margin | 8.6% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.9% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | -64.5% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.9% | -21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -179.0% | -257.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.06 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $226.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $226.0M | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.5M | $220.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $362.2M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.2M | $342.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.4M | $287.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.8M | $260.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-145.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.5M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.3M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-141.4M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $-38.8M |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.5% | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.8% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 52.6% |
| Q1 26 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -65.5% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.3% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -13.1% |
| Q1 26 | -64.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -61.1% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | -14.9% |
| Q1 26 | $-1.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.06 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.94 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.02 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $-0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $244.4M | $79.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $669.0M | $169.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-206.3M | $112.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $701.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $244.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $244.4M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.5M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.3M | $78.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.0M | $123.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.4M | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.3M | $104.9M |
| Q1 26 | $669.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $167.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $156.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-206.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-206.3M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.7M | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.9M | $140.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-97.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.1M | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.5M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $200.0M | $189.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $701.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $704.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $763.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $812.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $785.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $43.6M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.2M | $-22.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $131.4M | $-46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.8M | $-60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.9M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $38.4M |
| Q1 26 | $36.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.2M | $-60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.9M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $36.6M |
| Q1 26 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | -26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARRY
Segment breakdown not available.
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
