vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC. (ARW) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.7B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.7× Colgate-Palmolive). ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -0.7%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.1% vs 5.8%). Colgate-Palmolive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $172.6M). Over the past eight quarters, ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.4% CAGR vs 1.6%).

Arrow Electronics, Inc., is an American company headquartered in Centennial, Colorado. A global provider of electronic components and enterprise computing products, the company specializes in distribution and value-added services for original equipment manufacturers, value-added resellers, managed service providers, contract manufacturers and other commercial customers. The company is ranked No. 154 in the Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue. The compan...

The Colgate-Palmolive Company, commonly known as Colgate-Palmolive, is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company specializes in the production, distribution, and provision of household, health care, personal care, and veterinary products.

ARW vs CL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ARW
ARW
1.7× larger
ARW
$8.7B
$5.2B
CL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ARW
ARW
+14.3% gap
ARW
20.1%
5.8%
CL
Higher net margin
ARW
ARW
2.9% more per $
ARW
2.2%
-0.7%
CL
More free cash flow
CL
CL
$1.1B more FCF
CL
$1.3B
$172.6M
ARW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ARW
ARW
Annualised
ARW
12.4%
1.6%
CL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Revenue
$8.7B
$5.2B
Net Profit
$194.6M
$-36.0M
Gross Margin
11.5%
60.2%
Operating Margin
3.4%
1.7%
Net Margin
2.2%
-0.7%
Revenue YoY
20.1%
5.8%
Net Profit YoY
96.2%
-104.9%
EPS (diluted)
$3.74
$-0.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$8.7B
$5.2B
Q3 25
$7.7B
$5.1B
Q2 25
$7.6B
$5.1B
Q1 25
$6.8B
$4.9B
Q4 24
$7.3B
$4.9B
Q3 24
$6.8B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$6.9B
$5.1B
Q1 24
$6.9B
$5.1B
Net Profit
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$194.6M
$-36.0M
Q3 25
$109.2M
$735.0M
Q2 25
$187.7M
$743.0M
Q1 25
$79.7M
$690.0M
Q4 24
$99.2M
$738.0M
Q3 24
$100.6M
$737.0M
Q2 24
$108.7M
$731.0M
Q1 24
$83.6M
$683.0M
Gross Margin
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
11.5%
60.2%
Q3 25
10.8%
59.4%
Q2 25
11.2%
60.1%
Q1 25
11.4%
60.8%
Q4 24
11.0%
60.3%
Q3 24
11.5%
61.1%
Q2 24
12.3%
60.6%
Q1 24
12.4%
60.0%
Operating Margin
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
3.4%
1.7%
Q3 25
2.3%
20.6%
Q2 25
2.5%
21.1%
Q1 25
2.3%
21.9%
Q4 24
2.7%
21.5%
Q3 24
2.6%
21.2%
Q2 24
3.1%
21.6%
Q1 24
2.7%
20.7%
Net Margin
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
2.2%
-0.7%
Q3 25
1.4%
14.3%
Q2 25
2.5%
14.5%
Q1 25
1.2%
14.1%
Q4 24
1.4%
14.9%
Q3 24
1.5%
14.6%
Q2 24
1.6%
14.5%
Q1 24
1.2%
13.5%
EPS (diluted)
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$3.74
$-0.04
Q3 25
$2.09
$0.91
Q2 25
$3.59
$0.91
Q1 25
$1.51
$0.85
Q4 24
$1.87
$0.89
Q3 24
$1.88
$0.90
Q2 24
$2.01
$0.89
Q1 24
$1.53
$0.83

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$306.5M
$1.4B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$6.6B
$54.0M
Total Assets
$29.1B
$16.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
145.17×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$306.5M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$213.6M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$222.0M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$231.9M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$188.8M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$248.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$213.0M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$242.8M
$1.1B
Total Debt
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$7.8B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$7.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$6.6B
$54.0M
Q3 25
$6.4B
$856.0M
Q2 25
$6.3B
$702.0M
Q1 25
$5.9B
$363.0M
Q4 24
$5.8B
$212.0M
Q3 24
$6.0B
$435.0M
Q2 24
$5.7B
$123.0M
Q1 24
$5.7B
$230.0M
Total Assets
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$29.1B
$16.3B
Q3 25
$24.5B
$17.5B
Q2 25
$24.3B
$17.5B
Q1 25
$21.4B
$16.6B
Q4 24
$21.8B
$16.0B
Q3 24
$20.9B
$16.8B
Q2 24
$20.1B
$16.5B
Q1 24
$20.3B
$16.6B
Debt / Equity
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
145.17×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
33.04×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$199.9M
$1.5B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$172.6M
$1.3B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.0%
24.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.3%
3.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-37.2M
$3.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$199.9M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$-281.7M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$-205.9M
$884.0M
Q1 25
$351.7M
$600.0M
Q4 24
$326.5M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$80.6M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$320.2M
$990.0M
Q1 24
$403.2M
$681.0M
Free Cash Flow
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
$172.6M
$1.3B
Q3 25
$-312.0M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$-224.5M
$776.0M
Q1 25
$326.7M
$476.0M
Q4 24
$303.9M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$62.0M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$298.1M
$873.0M
Q1 24
$373.7M
$555.0M
FCF Margin
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
2.0%
24.4%
Q3 25
-4.0%
21.6%
Q2 25
-3.0%
15.2%
Q1 25
4.8%
9.7%
Q4 24
4.2%
21.9%
Q3 24
0.9%
20.5%
Q2 24
4.3%
17.3%
Q1 24
5.4%
11.0%
Capex Intensity
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
0.3%
3.4%
Q3 25
0.4%
3.0%
Q2 25
0.2%
2.1%
Q1 25
0.4%
2.5%
Q4 24
0.3%
3.7%
Q3 24
0.3%
2.7%
Q2 24
0.3%
2.3%
Q1 24
0.4%
2.5%
Cash Conversion
ARW
ARW
CL
CL
Q4 25
1.03×
Q3 25
-2.58×
1.72×
Q2 25
-1.10×
1.19×
Q1 25
4.41×
0.87×
Q4 24
3.29×
1.72×
Q3 24
0.80×
1.58×
Q2 24
2.95×
1.35×
Q1 24
4.82×
1.00×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ARW
ARW

Segment breakdown not available.

CL
CL

Other$3.0B58%
Pet Nutrition$1.2B23%
Oral Personal And Home Care$1.0B20%

Related Comparisons