vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) and Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amer Sports, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $776.3M, roughly 1.4× Cinemark Holdings, Inc.). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs 1.8%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amer Sports, Inc. is a Finnish multinational sporting equipment division based in Helsinki, Finland. Established in 1950 as an industrial conglomerate with interests as diverse as tobacco trading, ship owning and publishing, Amer has gradually evolved into a multinational firm devoted to the production and marketing of sporting goods. The company employs over 9,700 people. Since 2018, Amer has been a subsidiary of Chinese retail conglomerate Anta Sports.
Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is an American movie theater chain that started operations in 1977 and since then has operated theaters with hundreds of locations throughout the Americas. It is headquartered in Plano, Texas, in the Dallas–Fort Worth area. Cinemark operates 497 theaters and 5,653 screens in the U.S. and Latin America as of March 2025. It is also the largest movie theater chain in Brazil, with a 30 percent market share.
AS vs CNK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $776.3M |
| Net Profit | $19.0M | $34.1M |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -33.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $776.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $857.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $940.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $540.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $814.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $921.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $734.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $579.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $187.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $0.19 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.02× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AS
| Americas2 | $409.6M | 39% |
| EMEA1 | $356.9M | 34% |
| Greater China3 | $205.6M | 20% |
| Asia Pacific4 | $78.2M | 7% |
CNK
| Admissions Revenue | $383.8M | 49% |
| Concessions | $302.4M | 39% |
| Other Revenue | $37.5M | 5% |
| Transferred Over Time | $28.2M | 4% |
| Screen Advertising Screen Rental And Promotional Revenues | $24.4M | 3% |
