vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) and IAMGOLD CORP (IAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amer Sports, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $724.2M, roughly 1.5× IAMGOLD CORP).
Amer Sports, Inc. is a Finnish multinational sporting equipment division based in Helsinki, Finland. Established in 1950 as an industrial conglomerate with interests as diverse as tobacco trading, ship owning and publishing, Amer has gradually evolved into a multinational firm devoted to the production and marketing of sporting goods. The company employs over 9,700 people. Since 2018, Amer has been a subsidiary of Chinese retail conglomerate Anta Sports.
Iamgold Corporation is a Canadian company that owns and operates gold mines in Burkina Faso and Canada. Headquartered in Toronto, the company was incorporated in 1990, and went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange in 1996, with additional shares being listed on the New York Stock Exchange beginning in 2005. The company formerly owned or had stakes in the Sadiola and Yatela gold mines in Mali, the Mupane gold mine in Botswana, the Niobec niobium mine in Quebec, as well as a royalty in the Diav...
AS vs IAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $724.2M |
| Net Profit | $19.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $724.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $465.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $226.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.3B | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-95.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | 51.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -7.2% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.11 | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $199.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $75.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 5.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 9.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.02× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AS
| Americas2 | $409.6M | 39% |
| EMEA1 | $356.9M | 34% |
| Greater China3 | $205.6M | 20% |
| Asia Pacific4 | $78.2M | 7% |
IAG
Segment breakdown not available.
