vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ardmore Shipping Corp (ASC) and DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. (DDI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.0M vs $81.2M, roughly 1.0× Ardmore Shipping Corp). DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs 15.7%, a 14.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -15.5%).
Ardmore Shipping Corp is a global maritime transport company that owns and operates a fleet of mid-sized product and chemical tankers. It provides seaborne transport for petroleum products, specialty chemicals and bulk liquid commodities, serving energy, chemical and trading clients across key international trade routes.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
ASC vs DDI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $81.2M | $83.0M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $25.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 42.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.7% | 30.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.5% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.0% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $10.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.1M | $83.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.3M | $88.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.3M | $88.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | $86.9M | $73.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $91.9M | $75.2M |
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | $33.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.2M | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | $21.2M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $24.5M | $24.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.3% | 41.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | 24.6% | 40.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | 27.3% | 36.6% |
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.7% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.9% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | 24.4% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | 26.7% | 32.4% |
| Q3 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $10.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.47 | $13.39 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.92 | $12.23 | ||
| Q3 23 | $0.49 | $10.87 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.57 | $9.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $372.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $116.1M | $37.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $628.2M | $815.5M |
| Total Assets | $799.8M | $879.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $372.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $339.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $309.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $271.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $245.1M |
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.1M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | $52.5M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $78.9M | $38.1M |
| Q3 25 | $628.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $610.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $627.0M | $815.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.7M | $786.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $567.9M | $755.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | $517.0M | $697.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $503.8M | $672.8M |
| Q3 25 | $799.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $703.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $690.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $722.8M | $879.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $742.0M | $852.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $704.1M | $831.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | $686.4M | $760.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | $696.1M | $740.7M |
| Q3 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.04× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 23 | 0.10× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.16× | 0.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $17.9M | $31.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 38.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $129.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.9M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.2M | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | $42.0M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $42.1M | $-56.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-56.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -75.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.1% |
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.65× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.77× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 23 | 1.98× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 23 | 1.72× | -2.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
