vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASGN Inc (ASGN) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $970.0M, roughly 1.7× ASGN Inc). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs 0.6%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -3.0%).
ASGN Inc is a leading U.S.-headquartered professional services and workforce solutions provider. It specializes in supplying skilled talent and consulting services across high-growth segments including information technology, creative, digital, life sciences, and engineering, primarily serving enterprise clients across North America.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
ASGN vs BEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $970.0M | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $5.5M | $100.0M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.0% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 213.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $970.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $980.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $968.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $-88.0M |
| Q1 26 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -5.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $-0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $143.6M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $33.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $98.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.82× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $143.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $161.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $33.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $28.0B |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $98.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $73.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $379.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $290.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.9M | $379.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | $231.0M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.26× | 3.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.92× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
