vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.2× AdvanSix Inc.). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -0.8%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 9.4%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $31.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs 2.3%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
ASIX vs ATMU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $446.6M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $48.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 15.8% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 19.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.58 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $446.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $447.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $453.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $416.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $406.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $403.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $432.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $426.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $48.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $54.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $59.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $40.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $56.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $236.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $378.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $236.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $218.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $190.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $183.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $184.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $160.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $149.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $577.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $585.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $588.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $592.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $596.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $600.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $600.0M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $378.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $336.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $316.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $265.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $227.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $178.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $121.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.93× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $47.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $31.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $148.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $44.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $-8.2M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $68.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $54.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $-18.8M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | -4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 0.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
