vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($580.6M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.6× AdvanSix Inc.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 24.2% vs -0.8%, a 24.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 4.5%). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.7M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
ASIX vs CRUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $580.6M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $140.3M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 53.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 26.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 24.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 21.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $2.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $580.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $561.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $407.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $424.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $555.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $541.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $374.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $371.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $131.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $71.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $116.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $42.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $44.8M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 53.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 52.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 53.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 51.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 14.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $2.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $2.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $1.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $778.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $778.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $593.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $548.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $539.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $526.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $445.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $491.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $502.8M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $290.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $285.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 49.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $614.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $290.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $92.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $130.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $218.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $170.5M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $285.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $113.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $211.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $163.5M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 2.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
CRUS
| Audio Products Segment | $344.5M | 59% |
| High Performance Mixed Signal Products | $236.2M | 41% |
