vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $295.5M, roughly 1.2× Duolingo, Inc.). Duolingo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs -0.8%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Duolingo, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.0% vs 9.4%). Duolingo, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($103.0M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Duolingo, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.7% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Duolingo, Inc. is a leading global edtech firm operating a gamified language learning platform. It offers free and premium self-paced courses for over 40 languages, plus language certification, math learning tools, and literacy programs, serving individual learners, schools and corporate clients worldwide.
ASIX vs DUOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $295.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $35.1M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 55.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 8.0% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 27.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $295.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $282.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $271.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $230.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $209.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $192.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $178.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $292.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 72.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 72.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 72.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 71.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 72.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 73.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 107.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $5.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $976.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $884.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $854.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $888.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $977.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $893.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $824.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $822.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $766.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $105.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $103.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 34.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $368.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $105.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $84.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $105.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $83.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $62.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $89.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $104.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $81.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 2.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 5.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
DUOL
| Bookings | $283.5M | 96% |
| Other | $12.0M | 4% |
