vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $188.4M, roughly 1.9× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). AdvanSix Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.8% vs -79.7%, a 78.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (95.9% vs 9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (49.0% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
ASIX vs FIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $188.4M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $-150.2M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | -79.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 95.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -387.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $140.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $122.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $96.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $84.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-150.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-97.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-104.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $-70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $120.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $-124.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $-48.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | -45.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -70.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 81.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | -152.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -51.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | -56.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -79.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | -74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 125.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -154.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | -51.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -56.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $37.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $-122.5K |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $33.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-122.5K | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $181.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $476.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $202.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $370.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $394.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 176.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.94× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $-69.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-69.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-85.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $-17.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $-68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $-90.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-151.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $-32.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | -47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | -64.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | -71.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | -157.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -42.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -37.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 67.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 68.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | -0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
FIP
Segment breakdown not available.