vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $219.1M, roughly 1.6× Iridium Communications Inc.). Iridium Communications Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -0.8%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Iridium Communications Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
ASIX vs IRDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $219.1M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $219.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $226.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $216.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $214.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $213.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $201.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $32.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $96.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $79.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $93.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $159.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $63.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $462.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $450.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $473.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $518.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $576.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $663.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $786.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 13.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $108.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $100.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $104.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $79.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $36.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $68.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 34.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 5.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 2.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 2.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
