vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($692.4M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.9× AdvanSix Inc.). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs -0.8%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 3.6%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs 1.8%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
ASIX vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.
