vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $349.1M, roughly 1.0× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). AdvanSix Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.8% vs -10.8%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 9.4%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
ASIX vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |