vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Perion Network Ltd. (PERI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perion Network Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($368.7M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.0× AdvanSix Inc.). Perion Network Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 2.1% vs -0.8%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-2.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Perion Network Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (16.4% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Perion Network Ltd. is a publicly traded advertising technology company that provides digital advertising technology solutions to advertisers, agencies, retailers, and publishers. Its core offerings are delivered through Perion One, a unified omnichannel advertising platform designed to support campaign planning, activation, optimisation, and measurement across channels and verticals including connected television (CTV), digital out-of-home (DOOH), display, video advertising, as well as retai...
ASIX vs PERI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $368.7M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $7.7M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 2.0% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $368.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $266.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $157.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $508.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $323.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $145.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $78.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $23.8M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 16.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $156.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $722.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $915.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $156.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $156.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $156.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $187.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $187.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $187.6M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $722.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $722.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $722.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $718.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $718.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $718.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $915.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $915.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $915.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $2.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $-2.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -0.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $17.8M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
PERI
| Advertising Solutions | $231.4M | 63% |
| Search Advertising | $137.3M | 37% |
