vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.1× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). AdvanSix Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.8% vs -16.4%, a 15.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -7.5%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-31.3M). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs -40.6%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
ASIX vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $347.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $-42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $-2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $712.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $973.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $-33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $-38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | -7.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
