vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.4× AdvanSix Inc.). OLYMPIC STEEL INC runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -0.8%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 4.4%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs 0.1%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
ASIX vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
