vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AVINO SILVER & GOLD MINES LTD (ASM) and Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fangdd Network Group Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($28.4M vs $21.0M, roughly 1.3× AVINO SILVER & GOLD MINES LTD). AVINO SILVER & GOLD MINES LTD runs the higher net margin — 36.6% vs -18.7%, a 55.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fangdd Network Group Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.4% vs 44.0%).
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada-based mining company engaged in the exploration, development, and production of precious and base metals, primarily silver, gold, and copper. It operates its flagship Avino Mine property in Durango, Mexico, with its metal products supplied to global industrial and commodity markets.
Fangdd Network Group Ltd. operates a leading digital real estate service platform in China, offering property listing, transaction matching, home furnishing consultation and operational support for buyers, sellers, agents and real estate development enterprises across multiple domestic city tiers.
ASM vs DUO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.0M | $28.4M |
| Net Profit | $7.7M | $-5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | 9.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -35.3% |
| Net Margin | 36.6% | -18.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 44.0% | 47.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 558.9% | -322.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-1.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $9.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.0K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-803.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | 47.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 11.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -35.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -49.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 12.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-1.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.3M | $24.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $182.1M | $53.1M |
| Total Assets | $221.9M | $94.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | $182.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.8M | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.2M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $102.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $99.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $221.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.7M | $94.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.7M | $92.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $123.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $120.5M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.3M | $-3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.08× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $-808.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-83.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $502.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-957.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.87× | -0.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.92× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
