vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASML HOLDING NV (ASML) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASML HOLDING NVASMLEarnings & Financial Report
ASML Holding N.V. is a Dutch multinational corporation and semiconductor company that specializes in the development and manufacturing of photolithography machines which are used to produce integrated circuits. It is the largest supplier for the semiconductor industry, as well as the most advanced producer of extreme ultraviolet photolithography (EUV) machines that are required to manufacture the most advanced chips. As of January 2026, its market capitalization was approximately $527 billion...
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-55.51 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
