vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACTELIS NETWORKS INC (ASNS) and Maris Tech Ltd. (MTEK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACTELIS NETWORKS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4M vs $473.9K, roughly 2.9× Maris Tech Ltd.). ACTELIS NETWORKS INC runs the higher net margin — -184.5% vs -477.8%, a 293.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACTELIS NETWORKS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs -51.0%).
Actelis Networks Inc develops and manufactures high-performance broadband access networking solutions for telecom operators, enterprises and government entities. Its core products include Ethernet over copper systems delivering cost-effective high-speed connectivity over existing copper infrastructure, with key markets across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific.
ASNS vs MTEK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4M | $473.9K |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 35.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -122.3% | -511.9% |
| Net Margin | -184.5% | -477.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | -51.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -40.1% | 0.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.08 | $-0.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $643.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $941.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $721.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $726.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-511.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-78.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -122.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -300.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -188.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -251.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -154.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -257.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -184.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -307.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -202.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -258.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -169.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -273.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-5.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.90 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.50 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $6.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8M | $7.3M |
| Total Assets | $9.5M | $10.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.1M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -490.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 15.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-203.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-204.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
