vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT) and Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Assertio Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5M vs $8.9M, roughly 1.5× Magyar Bancorp, Inc.). On growth, Magyar Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.0% vs -57.9%).
Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. is an American specialty pharmaceutical company. It mainly markets products for treatment in neurology, pain and diseases of the central nervous system. Depomed was founded in 1995 and is headquartered in Newark, California. It is a publicly traded company on NASDAQ, with several products approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On August 15, 2018, the company announced its name change from Depomed, Inc., to Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. As o...
Magyar Bank is a bank based in New Brunswick, New Jersey with branches in Central Jersey.
ASRT vs MGYR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.5M | $8.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $3.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -86.7% | 48.3% |
| Net Margin | — | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -57.9% | 19.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.54 | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.5M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | -86.7% | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.6% | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.4% | 32.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -51.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.8% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.9% | 25.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.54 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.28 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.4M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $49.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.0M | $121.7M |
| Total Assets | $267.0M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.4M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.7M | $50.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $94.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.2M | $109.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.5M | $107.6M |
| Q4 25 | $267.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $286.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $284.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.4M | $944.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.0M | $928.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-30.0M | $3.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $8.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-30.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | $553.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $428.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASRT
| Products | $12.8M | 95% |
| Other | $719.0K | 5% |
MGYR
Segment breakdown not available.
