vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTROTECH Corp (ASTC) and Profusa, Inc. (PFSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASTROTECH Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.0K vs $75.0K, roughly 2.0× Profusa, Inc.). ASTROTECH Corp runs the higher net margin — -2653.4% vs -3329.3%, a 676.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Astrotech Corporation, formerly Spacehab Inc., is a technology incubator headquartered in Austin, Texas. Astrotech uses technology sourced internally and from research institutions, government laboratories, and universities to fund, manage and sell start-up companies. Astrotech Corporation's subsidiaries provide commercial products and services to NASA, the U.S. Department of Defense, national space agencies, and global commercial customers.
Profusa, Inc. is a biotechnology firm specializing in long-term implantable biosensor technology. Its products enable continuous real-time monitoring of multiple biological markers, serving core segments including clinical care, chronic disease management, medical research, and global digital health markets.
ASTC vs PFSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.0K | $75.0K |
| Net Profit | $-3.9M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -2635.8% | -1470.7% |
| Net Margin | -2653.4% | -3329.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -43.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | -579.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $534.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $75.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $425.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 47.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 43.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2635.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1190.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1326.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -724.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1655.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1470.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | -275.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -784.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2653.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1166.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1331.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -680.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1536.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3329.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | -236.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -685.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0M | $533 |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.5M | $-117.0M |
| Total Assets | $19.7M | $8.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $533 | ||
| Q4 23 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $51.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-117.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $42.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | $42.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $44.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2671.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 277.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-14.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2671.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1476.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1231.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -728.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1288.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -175.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -723.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 277.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 150.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 158.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 122.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 5.6% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
