vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTROTECH Corp (ASTC) and TREASURE GLOBAL INC (TGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TREASURE GLOBAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.5K vs $148.0K, roughly 1.2× ASTROTECH Corp). TREASURE GLOBAL INC runs the higher net margin — -1169.1% vs -2653.4%, a 1484.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TREASURE GLOBAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-12.0% vs -43.3%). TREASURE GLOBAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-4.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ASTROTECH Corp's revenue compounded faster (-40.2% CAGR vs -83.5%).
Astrotech Corporation, formerly Spacehab Inc., is a technology incubator headquartered in Austin, Texas. Astrotech uses technology sourced internally and from research institutions, government laboratories, and universities to fund, manage and sell start-up companies. Astrotech Corporation's subsidiaries provide commercial products and services to NASA, the U.S. Department of Defense, national space agencies, and global commercial customers.
Treasure Global Inc is a consumer technology company offering integrated digital commerce solutions, customer loyalty rewards programs, and cashless payment services. It primarily operates across Southeast Asian markets, serving individual users and small-to-medium enterprise clients.
ASTC vs TGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.0K | $182.5K |
| Net Profit | $-3.9M | $-2.1M |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | 0.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2635.8% | -953.5% |
| Net Margin | -2653.4% | -1169.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -43.3% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | -124.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.0K | $182.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $534.0K | $666.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.0K | $301.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $207.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $293.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $-232.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-950.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 68.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | -2635.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1190.6% | -953.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1326.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -724.2% | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1655.6% | -229.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -391.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -85.9% |
| Q4 25 | -2653.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1166.7% | -1169.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1331.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -680.3% | 189.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1536.0% | -77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -458.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -107.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-17.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-116.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.5M | $12.0M |
| Total Assets | $19.7M | $16.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $2.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | $504.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $29.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.1M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.5M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $-1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.0M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2671.6% | -1318.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 277.7% | 353.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-14.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $-606.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-976.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -2671.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1476.1% | -1318.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1231.4% | -822.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -728.1% | -635.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1288.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1614.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -67.1% |
| Q4 25 | 277.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 150.8% | 353.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 158.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 122.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
