vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTROTECH Corp (ASTC) and ATIF Holdings Ltd (ZBAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($250.0K vs $148.0K, roughly 1.7× ASTROTECH Corp). ATIF Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -635.6% vs -2653.4%, a 2017.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ATIF Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.0% vs -43.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ATIF Holdings Ltd's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -40.2%).
Astrotech Corporation, formerly Spacehab Inc., is a technology incubator headquartered in Austin, Texas. Astrotech uses technology sourced internally and from research institutions, government laboratories, and universities to fund, manage and sell start-up companies. Astrotech Corporation's subsidiaries provide commercial products and services to NASA, the U.S. Department of Defense, national space agencies, and global commercial customers.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is a professional business advisory service provider that mainly serves small and medium-sized enterprises across the Asia-Pacific region. It offers corporate strategic consulting, fundraising guidance, cross-border expansion support, and industry resource matching services for clients in technology, consumer goods, manufacturing and other key sectors.
ASTC vs ZBAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.0K | $250.0K |
| Net Profit | $-3.9M | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -2635.8% | -75.6% |
| Net Margin | -2653.4% | -635.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -43.3% | 25.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | -96.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0K | $250.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $534.0K | $200.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $270.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-807.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-407.6K |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -2635.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1190.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1326.4% | -75.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -724.2% | -175.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1655.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -260.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2190.1% |
| Q4 25 | -2653.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1166.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1331.8% | -635.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -680.3% | -951.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1536.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -403.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1630.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0M | $7.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.5M | $8.4M |
| Total Assets | $19.7M | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $139.2K |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $506.3K |
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $-939.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2671.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 277.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-14.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-939.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-395.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-62.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-212.8K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-213.5K |
| Q4 25 | -2671.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1476.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1231.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -728.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1288.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -854.1% |
| Q4 25 | 277.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 150.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 158.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 122.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
