vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC (ASTE) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($721.6M vs $396.3M, roughly 1.8× ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC). Celsius Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 0.3%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 20.3%). ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($32.6M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Astec International plc, better known as Astec Power or just Astec, was an international electronics company originally based in Hong Kong that manufactured power supply units and electric power conversion hardware. It was a major vendor of power supply units for computer systems, and for a time it was the largest global manufacturer of power supplies.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
ASTE vs CELH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $396.3M | $721.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.3M | $24.7M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | 117.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 231.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $396.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $400.6M | $721.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $350.1M | $725.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.3M | $739.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.4M | $329.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.0M | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.4M | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.5M | $402.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $99.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $44.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.0M | $79.8M |
| Q1 26 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 52.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.5% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.1% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.92 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.27 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.61 | $0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $398.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $365.5M | $676.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $678.1M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.1M | $398.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8M | $806.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.6M | $615.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.4M | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.8M | $890.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.9M | $903.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.4M | $903.2M |
| Q1 26 | $365.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $676.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $870.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $871.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $678.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $681.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $668.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $674.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $653.2M | $443.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $637.8M | $399.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $631.4M | $423.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $633.3M | $415.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.7M | $-119.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $32.6M | $-130.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | -18.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.92× | -4.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $36.7M | $323.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $-119.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.1M | $331.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $103.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.6M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9M | $39.6M |
| Q1 26 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4M | $-130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.3M | $321.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $96.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1M | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $30.4M |
| Q1 26 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 15.92× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.01× | -4.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.43× | 2.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASTE
| Infrastructure Solutions | $237.0M | 60% |
| Materials Solutions | $159.3M | 40% |
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
