vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Astrana Health, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($950.5M vs $721.6M, roughly 1.3× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Celsius Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 0.7%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 42.9%). Astrana Health, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.0M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Astrana Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (53.3% CAGR vs 42.4%).

Astrana Health, Inc. is a U.S.-based value-based healthcare services provider that primarily serves Medicare-eligible senior populations across the United States. It offers in-home primary care, chronic disease management, and care coordination services, aiming to improve patient health outcomes and reduce unnecessary medical costs.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.

ASTH vs CELH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ASTH
ASTH
1.3× larger
ASTH
$950.5M
$721.6M
CELH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CELH
CELH
+74.3% gap
CELH
117.2%
42.9%
ASTH
Higher net margin
CELH
CELH
2.7% more per $
CELH
3.4%
0.7%
ASTH
More free cash flow
ASTH
ASTH
$124.0M more FCF
ASTH
$-6.0M
$-130.0M
CELH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ASTH
ASTH
Annualised
ASTH
53.3%
42.4%
CELH

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Revenue
$950.5M
$721.6M
Net Profit
$6.6M
$24.7M
Gross Margin
47.4%
Operating Margin
1.9%
3.6%
Net Margin
0.7%
3.4%
Revenue YoY
42.9%
117.2%
Net Profit YoY
184.4%
231.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.12
$0.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$950.5M
$721.6M
Q3 25
$956.0M
$725.1M
Q2 25
$654.8M
$739.3M
Q1 25
$620.4M
$329.3M
Q4 24
$665.2M
$332.2M
Q3 24
$478.7M
$265.7M
Q2 24
$486.3M
$402.0M
Q1 24
$404.4M
$355.7M
Net Profit
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$6.6M
$24.7M
Q3 25
$373.0K
$-61.0M
Q2 25
$9.4M
$99.9M
Q1 25
$6.7M
$44.4M
Q4 24
$-7.8M
$-18.9M
Q3 24
$16.1M
$6.4M
Q2 24
$19.2M
$79.8M
Q1 24
$14.8M
$77.8M
Gross Margin
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
47.4%
Q3 25
51.3%
Q2 25
51.5%
Q1 25
52.3%
Q4 24
50.2%
Q3 24
46.0%
Q2 24
52.0%
Q1 24
51.2%
Operating Margin
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
1.9%
3.6%
Q3 25
2.0%
-11.0%
Q2 25
3.1%
19.3%
Q1 25
3.3%
15.8%
Q4 24
0.1%
-5.6%
Q3 24
5.9%
-1.2%
Q2 24
6.2%
23.4%
Q1 24
7.5%
23.4%
Net Margin
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
0.7%
3.4%
Q3 25
0.0%
-8.4%
Q2 25
1.4%
13.5%
Q1 25
1.1%
13.5%
Q4 24
-1.2%
-5.7%
Q3 24
3.4%
2.4%
Q2 24
3.9%
19.8%
Q1 24
3.7%
21.9%
EPS (diluted)
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$0.12
$0.04
Q3 25
$0.01
$-0.27
Q2 25
$0.19
$0.33
Q1 25
$0.14
$0.15
Q4 24
$-0.14
$-0.10
Q3 24
$0.33
$0.00
Q2 24
$0.40
$0.28
Q1 24
$0.31
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$429.5M
$398.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$676.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$779.3M
$1.2B
Total Assets
$2.2B
$5.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.57×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$429.5M
$398.9M
Q3 25
$463.4M
$806.0M
Q2 25
$342.1M
$615.2M
Q1 25
$260.9M
$977.3M
Q4 24
$290.8M
$890.2M
Q3 24
$350.3M
$903.7M
Q2 24
$327.7M
$903.2M
Q1 24
$337.3M
$879.5M
Total Debt
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$676.9M
Q3 25
$870.5M
Q2 25
$871.9M
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$779.3M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$775.5M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$765.5M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$745.4M
$443.1M
Q4 24
$712.7M
$399.9M
Q3 24
$704.6M
$423.6M
Q2 24
$678.9M
$415.8M
Q1 24
$653.5M
$338.2M
Total Assets
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$2.2B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$5.3B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$1.7B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$1.6B
Debt / Equity
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
0.57×
Q3 25
0.72×
Q2 25
0.69×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-2.9M
$-119.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-6.0M
$-130.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-0.6%
-18.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.3%
1.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.44×
-4.83×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$104.5M
$323.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$-2.9M
$-119.4M
Q3 25
$10.0M
$331.8M
Q2 25
$90.9M
$43.7M
Q1 25
$16.6M
$103.4M
Q4 24
$-10.9M
$75.7M
Q3 24
$34.0M
$12.9M
Q2 24
$23.2M
$39.6M
Q1 24
$6.0M
$134.6M
Free Cash Flow
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
$-6.0M
$-130.0M
Q3 25
$7.4M
$321.5M
Q2 25
$89.5M
$35.5M
Q1 25
$13.6M
$96.4M
Q4 24
$-13.5M
$70.3M
Q3 24
$31.7M
$8.7M
Q2 24
$20.4M
$30.4M
Q1 24
$5.6M
$130.1M
FCF Margin
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
-0.6%
-18.0%
Q3 25
0.8%
44.3%
Q2 25
13.7%
4.8%
Q1 25
2.2%
29.3%
Q4 24
-2.0%
21.2%
Q3 24
6.6%
3.3%
Q2 24
4.2%
7.6%
Q1 24
1.4%
36.6%
Capex Intensity
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
0.3%
1.5%
Q3 25
0.3%
1.4%
Q2 25
0.2%
1.1%
Q1 25
0.5%
2.1%
Q4 24
0.4%
1.6%
Q3 24
0.5%
1.6%
Q2 24
0.6%
2.3%
Q1 24
0.1%
1.3%
Cash Conversion
ASTH
ASTH
CELH
CELH
Q4 25
-0.44×
-4.83×
Q3 25
26.69×
Q2 25
9.65×
0.44×
Q1 25
2.48×
2.33×
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.11×
2.03×
Q2 24
1.21×
0.50×
Q1 24
0.40×
1.73×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ASTH
ASTH

Medicare$542.4M57%
Commercial$99.1M10%
Care Delivery$92.1M10%
Care Enablement$78.9M8%
Other Third Parties$58.0M6%
Health Care Patient Service$39.8M4%
Health Care Other$25.5M3%
Other$12.1M1%
Management Service$10.3M1%

CELH
CELH

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons