vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Axogen, Inc. (AXGN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Axogen, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.5M vs $54.3M, roughly 1.1× AST SpaceMobile, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (173.4% CAGR vs 13.3%).
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is a publicly traded satellite designer and manufacturer based in Midland, Texas, United States. The company is building the SpaceMobile satellite constellation, a space-based cellular broadband network designed to connect directly to standard, unmodified smartphones. The network is intended to deliver 4G and 5G broadband coverage globally, particularly in remote and underserved regions.
Axogen is a developer of surgical solutions, including human tissue grafts, based in Alachua, Florida. Axogen products are designed to remedy peripheral nerve damage. In 2013 the company raised $18 million in its initial public offering (IPO). Axogen uses a cell graft technology AVANCE to mimic a human nerve. The company also creates nerve connectors and soft tissue membranes. The company reports sensory and movement recovery in 87 percent of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Axogen is...
ASTS vs AXGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54.3M | $61.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-19.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -560.4% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | — | -31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -410.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $54.3M | $61.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.3M | $59.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-19.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-74.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-122.9M | $708.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $579.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $450.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 74.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.8% |
| Q1 26 | -560.4% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -175.0% | -16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1109.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -136.2% | -22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -833.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3B | $82.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $12.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $244.8M |
| Total Assets | $5.0B | $289.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $82.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.1M |
| Q1 26 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | $244.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $128.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $120.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $112.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $105.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $99.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $95.7M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | $289.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $221.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $205.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $188.9M |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $65.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-330.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-302.9M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -609.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2055.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 728.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1617.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
