vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (ASX) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., previously known as ASE Group, is a leading provider of independent semiconductor packaging and test manufacturing services, with its headquarters in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Marvell Technology, Inc. is an American company, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, which develops and produces semiconductors and related technology. Founded in 1995, the company had more than 6,500 employees as of 2024, with over 10,000 patents worldwide, and an annual revenue of $5.5 billion for fiscal 2024.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $194.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $177.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $200.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-676.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-193.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-215.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-392.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 51.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -27.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.45 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
