vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anterix Inc. (ATEX) and CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CuriosityStream Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.2M vs $1.6M, roughly 12.2× Anterix Inc.). CuriosityStream Inc. runs the higher net margin — -19.7% vs -419.6%, a 399.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CuriosityStream Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.8% vs 0.4%). CuriosityStream Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.9M vs $-8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, CuriosityStream Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.5% CAGR vs 11.7%).
Anterix Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered wireless communications company that owns licensed 900 MHz spectrum assets, providing secure, dedicated private broadband network solutions for critical infrastructure operators including electric utilities, public safety agencies, and transportation providers. Its primary market is North America, supporting clients requiring highly reliable connectivity for mission-critical operations.
Curiosity Stream Inc., formerly branded as CuriosityStream, is an American media company and over-the-top subscription video streaming service which offers documentary programming including films, series, and TV shows. The company offers a video on demand subscription service branded as "Curiosity Stream" and a linear broadcast television channel known as the Curiosity Channel through various services including FuboTV and The Roku Channel.
ATEX vs CURI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $19.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.6M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -576.0% | -17.6% |
| Net Margin | -419.6% | -19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 35.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -185.6% | -34.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.5M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $784.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | $319.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $-5.0M |
| Q4 25 | -576.0% | -17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -846.6% | -25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -984.4% | -20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -834.2% | -30.4% |
| Q4 25 | -419.6% | -19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3449.5% | -20.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1775.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 662.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 492.3% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -823.1% | -24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1018.0% | -16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -746.9% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.86 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.35 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.41 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.69 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.84 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $29.5M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $236.0M | $41.5M |
| Total Assets | $417.0M | $75.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.5M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.4M | $33.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8M | $32.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.1M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.7M | $39.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.6M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $236.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.8M | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.6M | $58.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.7M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.1M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | $64.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $161.0M | $67.0M |
| Q4 25 | $417.0M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.4M | $74.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.6M | $78.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $333.1M | $85.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.7M | $86.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.2M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $321.1M | $90.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $324.9M | $94.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.3M | $4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.3M | $3.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -526.4% | 20.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $666.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-8.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -526.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1195.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -173.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 484.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.12× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.80× | 6.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
