vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autohome Inc. (ATHM) and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $249.8M, roughly 1.6× Autohome Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 23.8%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Autohome Inc. is a leading online destination for automobile consumers in China. Through its websites and mobile apps, it provides professionally produced content, user-generated content, comprehensive vehicle listings, and a suite of services for dealers, automakers, and car buyers, including new and used car listings, financing, insurance, and online transactions.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
ATHM vs DLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $249.8M | $395.6M |
| Net Profit | $59.4M | $94.9M |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 88.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 28.5% |
| Net Margin | 23.8% | 24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $395.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.8M | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $245.4M | $315.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | $369.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.9M | $304.8M |
| Q2 26 | — | $94.9M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $58.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | 88.7% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.7% | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.4% | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.0% | 88.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 15.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | 19.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $594.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $594.7M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $626.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $520.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $482.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $147.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $147.3M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $472.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $327.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $435.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $297.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 142.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 97.5% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATHM
| Online marketplace and others | $114.7M | 46% |
| Leads generation services | $93.2M | 37% |
| Media services | $41.9M | 17% |
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
