vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autohome Inc. (ATHM) and Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Autohome Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($249.8M vs $156.4M, roughly 1.6× Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs 23.8%, a 33.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Autohome Inc. is a leading online destination for automobile consumers in China. Through its websites and mobile apps, it provides professionally produced content, user-generated content, comprehensive vehicle listings, and a suite of services for dealers, automakers, and car buyers, including new and used car listings, financing, insurance, and online transactions.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
ATHM vs FIGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $249.8M | $156.4M |
| Net Profit | $59.4M | $89.6M |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 33.7% |
| Net Margin | 23.8% | 57.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $249.8M | $156.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $245.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $261.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $252.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $69.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 82.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 18.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | 23.8% | 57.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 27.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $466.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | — | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $466.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATHM
| Online marketplace and others | $114.7M | 46% |
| Leads generation services | $93.2M | 37% |
| Media services | $41.9M | 17% |
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
