vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autohome Inc. (ATHM) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Autohome Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($249.8M vs $2.8M, roughly 90.8× D-Wave Quantum Inc.). Autohome Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.8% vs -1538.0%, a 1561.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, D-Wave Quantum Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.7% CAGR vs -0.6%).
@Home Network was a high-speed cable Internet service provider from 1996 to 2002. It was founded by Milo Medin, cable companies Tele-Communications Inc. (TCI), Comcast, and Cox Communications, and William Randolph Hearst III, who was their first CEO, as a joint venture to produce high-speed cable Internet service through two-way television cable infrastructure. At the company's peak, it provided high-speed Internet service for 4.1 million subscribers in the United States, Canada, Japan, Austr...
D-Wave Quantum Inc. is a quantum computing company with locations in Palo Alto, California and Burnaby, British Columbia. D-Wave claims to be the world's first company to sell computers that exploit quantum effects in their operation. D-Wave's early customers include Lockheed Martin, the University of Southern California, Google/NASA, and Los Alamos National Laboratory.
ATHM vs QBTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $249.8M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $59.4M | $-42.3M |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -1266.0% |
| Net Margin | 23.8% | -1538.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 19.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $245.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.9M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.9M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-42.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.0M | $-167.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-86.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.4M | $-17.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.7% | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.4% | 63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.0% | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.5% | 63.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.3% | 67.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1266.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | -741.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | -856.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | -75.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -876.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | -1103.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | -863.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.2% | -710.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1538.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.8% | -3743.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | -5406.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3727.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | -1214.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.9% | -814.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.5% | -702.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $884.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $852.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $915.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $884.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $836.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $819.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $304.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $178.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $852.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $670.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $694.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $915.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $865.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $843.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $325.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $199.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $61.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $48.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-20.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -727.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 60.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-75.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -727.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -536.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -518.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -131.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -982.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -687.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -504.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATHM
| Online marketplace and others | $114.7M | 46% |
| Leads generation services | $93.2M | 37% |
| Media services | $41.9M | 17% |
QBTS
Segment breakdown not available.
