vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ATI INC (ATI) and Bausch & Lomb Corp (BLCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bausch & Lomb Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× ATI INC). ATI INC runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -4.1%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bausch & Lomb Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 0.4%). ATI INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($223.1M vs $60.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Bausch & Lomb Corp's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 6.2%).
ATI Technologies Inc. was a Canadian semiconductor technology corporation based in Markham, Ontario, that specialized in the development of graphics processing units and chipsets. Founded in 1985, the company listed publicly in 1993 and was acquired by AMD in 2006. As a major fabless semiconductor company, ATI conducted research and development in-house and outsourced the manufacturing and assembly of its products. With the decline and eventual bankruptcy of 3dfx in 2000, ATI and its chief ri...
Bausch & Lomb is an American-Canadian eye health products company based in Vaughan, Ontario, Canada. It is one of the world's largest suppliers of contact lenses, lens care products, pharmaceuticals, intraocular lenses, and other eye surgery products. The company was founded in Rochester, New York, in 1853 by optician John Bausch and cabinet maker turned financial backer Henry Lomb. Until its sale in 2013, Bausch + Lomb was one of the oldest continually operating companies in the United States.
ATI vs BLCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $96.6M | $-58.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 8.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | -4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.5% | -1833.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.70 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $96.6M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.7M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.0M | $-212.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.1M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.7M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.9M | $-151.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.1M | $-167.0M |
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | -12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | -15.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.70 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.67 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.94 | $-0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.46 | $-0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $416.7M | $383.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7B | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $6.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $14.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.95× | 0.78× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $416.7M | $383.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.2M | $310.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.6M | $266.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.8M | $202.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $721.2M | $305.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $406.6M | $329.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.6M | $285.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $394.4M | $315.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $6.7B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $13.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $13.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8B | $13.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.95× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | 0.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.93× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.04× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.70× | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $315.8M | $136.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $223.1M | $60.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | 4.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.27× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $333.7M | $-66.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $315.8M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.5M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $161.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-92.5M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $380.9M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.0M | $154.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-98.8M | $41.0M |
| Q4 25 | $223.1M | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.4M | $-54.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-145.8M | $-135.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.6M | $-70.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-41.8M | $94.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.9M | $-57.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-164.6M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | -11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.4% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.8% | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.95× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 38.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.49× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATI
| Other | $527.1M | 45% |
| Advanced Alloys Solutions | $333.5M | 28% |
| Airframes Commercial | $82.0M | 7% |
| Defense | $73.7M | 6% |
| Electronics Market | $53.1M | 5% |
| Internal Customers | $50.9M | 4% |
| Specialty Energy | $29.3M | 2% |
| Medical Market | $12.2M | 1% |
| Construction Mining Market | $7.2M | 1% |
| Other Market | $5.6M | 0% |
| Conventional Energy | $1.9M | 0% |
| Automotive Market | $600.0K | 0% |
BLCO
| Overthe Counter Products | $489.0M | 35% |
| Pharmaceuticals | $378.0M | 27% |
| Other | $263.0M | 19% |
| Surgical | $249.0M | 18% |
| Brandedand Other Generic Products | $14.0M | 1% |
| Other Revenues | $3.0M | 0% |
| Pharmaceutical Products | $2.0M | 0% |
