vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ATI INC (ATI) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Weyerhaeuser is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.5× ATI INC). ATI INC runs the higher net margin — 10.3% vs 9.0%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Weyerhaeuser posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.1% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, ATI INC's revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs -5.6%).
ATI Technologies Inc. was a Canadian semiconductor technology corporation based in Markham, Ontario, that specialized in the development of graphics processing units and chipsets. Founded in 1985, the company listed publicly in 1993 and was acquired by AMD in 2006. As a major fabless semiconductor company, ATI conducted research and development in-house and outsourced the manufacturing and assembly of its products. With the decline and eventual bankruptcy of 3dfx in 2000, ATI and its chief ri...
The Weyerhaeuser Company is an American timberland company which owns approximately 10,400,000 acres of timberlands in the U.S., and manages an additional 14,000,000 acres of timberlands under long-term licenses in Canada. The company has manufactured wood products for over a century. It operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT).
ATI vs WY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $118.2M | $156.0M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.2% | 14.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.3% | 9.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | 12.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.9% | 110.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.85 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | $156.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.6M | $74.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.7M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.1M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.9M | $173.0M |
| Q1 26 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | 14.2% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 13.9% |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.85 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.70 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.67 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.94 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $401.7M | $299.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | $372.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $9.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $16.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.95× | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $401.7M | $299.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $416.7M | $464.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.2M | $401.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.6M | $592.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.8M | $560.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $721.2M | $684.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $406.6M | $877.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.6M | $997.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $372.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $10.0B |
| Q1 26 | $5.2B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $16.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.95× | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.95× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.93× | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
