vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atlas Lithium Corp (ATLX) and BRADY CORP (BRC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRADY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($405.3M vs $42.0K, roughly 9655.9× Atlas Lithium Corp). BRADY CORP runs the higher net margin — -17708.6% vs 13.3%, a 17721.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRADY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs -73.0%). BRADY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($22.4M vs $-7.0M). Over the past eight quarters, BRADY CORP's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -55.6%).
Atlas Copco Group is a Swedish multinational industrial company. It manufactures compressors, vacuum equipment, pumps, generators, assembly tools, quality assurance equipment and other products and systems for industrial applications and mobile power generation. The products are sold in around 180 countries.
Brady Corporation is an American developer and manufacturer of specialty products, technical equipment, and services for identifying components used in workplaces. Headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Brady employs 6,600 people in North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia and serves customers and markets globally. Brady Corporation was founded as W.H. Brady Co. in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, in 1914, by William Henry Brady (1879–1953). In 1984, the company went public and began tradi...
ATLX vs BRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $42.0K | $405.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $53.9M |
| Gross Margin | 51.1% | 51.5% |
| Operating Margin | -18376.1% | 16.8% |
| Net Margin | -17708.6% | 13.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -73.0% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 35.7% | 15.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $42.0K | $405.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1 | $397.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.0K | $382.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.4K | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $155.6K | $377.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.0K | $343.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.3K | $343.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.8K | $322.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.4M | $53.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.0M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.6M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.6M | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.2M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.0M | $43.6M |
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -42.4% | 51.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -172.1% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.0% | 51.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.0% | 51.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.8% | 50.2% |
| Q4 25 | -18376.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 799268600.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14241.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26969.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6980.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5767.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4719.4% | 18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6195.7% | 16.7% |
| Q4 25 | -17708.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 695327600.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12931.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24754.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7426.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5073.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4534.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6093.1% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.60 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.67 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $35.9M | $182.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $115.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.0M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $87.7M | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $174.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.9M | $152.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $138.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $145.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $250.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $160.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $143.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $52.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $561.9K | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $87.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.6M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.8M | $33.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.0M | $22.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16667.4% | 5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 463.1% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 0.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-28.3M | $159.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-6.8M | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $59.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $39.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.2M | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | $36.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.2M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | $55.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.6M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.8M | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.1M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.3M | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.0M | $-13.5M |
| Q4 25 | -16667.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 822801700.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12685.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20812.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5043.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4559.3% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6576.9% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5621.0% | -4.2% |
| Q4 25 | 463.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -116975500.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3605.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8722.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2105.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2918.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4011.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2752.4% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATLX
Segment breakdown not available.
BRC
| Americas Asia | $215.1M | 53% |
| Europe Australia | $119.9M | 30% |
| Other | $70.2M | 17% |
