vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $270.4M, roughly 1.7× Enhabit, Inc.). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -14.3%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 4.7%). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.2M vs $3.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Enhabit, Inc., is a Dallas, Texas-based provider of home health and hospice services. The company operates 255 home health and 110 hospice locations in 34 states with a concentration in Texas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma and Mississippi. Enhabit is the fourth-largest provider of home health services in the United States and is a leading provider of hospice services. The company was formed in 2022 when Encompass Health spun off its home health and hospice business.
ATMU vs EHAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $270.4M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $-38.7M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | -14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | 15.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $270.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $263.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $266.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $259.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $258.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $253.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $260.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | $262.4M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $-110.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $-200.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $200.0K |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | -16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | -38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | -17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | -43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $-2.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $43.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | $426.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $534.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | 0.80× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $39.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $28.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | $36.5M |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | $426.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | $441.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | $456.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | $467.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | $492.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | $502.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | $512.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | $526.7M |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $566.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $552.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $543.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $523.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $566.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $674.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $672.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | 0.78× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $4.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $65.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $37.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $17.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $17.3M |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $17.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | $15.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 2.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 1.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | 86.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
EHAB
| Third Party Payor Medicare | $111.6M | 41% |
| Third Party Payor Medicare Advantage | $67.5M | 25% |
| Hospice Segment | $63.6M | 24% |
| Third Party Payor Managed Care | $24.9M | 9% |
| Third Party Payor Medicaid | $1.7M | 1% |
