vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and JACK IN THE BOX INC (JACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $349.5M, roughly 1.3× JACK IN THE BOX INC). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -0.7%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -25.5%). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.2M vs $7.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -18.6%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Jack in the Box, Inc. is an American fast food restaurant chain founded on February 21, 1951, by Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, California, where it is headquartered. The chain has over 2,200 locations, primarily serving the West Coast of the United States. Restaurants are also found in large urban areas outside the West Coast, as well as two in Guam. The company also formerly operated the Qdoba Mexican Grill chain until Apollo Global Management bought the chain in December 2017.
ATMU vs JACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $349.5M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 13.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | -107.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $349.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $336.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $371.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $365.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $-142.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $33.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $25.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | -42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $-7.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $1.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $-936.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-936.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $-976.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $-827.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $-702.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $30.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $7.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $34.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $-36.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $105.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $-63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $84.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $6.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | -18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 22.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 3.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 0.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
JACK
| Restaurant Sales | $131.9M | 38% |
| Franchise | $97.4M | 28% |
| Royaltyand Other | $58.9M | 17% |
| Advertising | $56.6M | 16% |
| Technology Service | $4.7M | 1% |
| Franchise Fees | $1.7M | 0% |
