vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.5× Enpro Inc.). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -10.8%, a 21.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Enpro Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
ATMU vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | $257.5M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 41.2% |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | $644.9M |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |