vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Seneca Foods Corp (SENEB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Seneca Foods Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $446.6M, roughly 1.1× Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs 8.8%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 1.1%). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.2M vs $22.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Seneca Foods Corp's revenue compounded faster (77.1% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Seneca Foods Corporation is an American food processor and distributor headquartered in Fairport, New York, United States. Seneca Foods Corporation conducts its business almost entirely in food packaging, which contributed to about 98% of the company's fiscal year net sales in 2017. Canned vegetables represented 65%, fruit products represented 23%, frozen fruit and vegetables represented 11% and fruit chip products represented 1% of the total food packaging net sales. Non-food packaging sales...
ATMU vs SENEB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $44.8M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 11.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | 8.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | 205.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $6.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $460.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $297.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $345.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $502.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $425.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $304.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | $162.2M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $601.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $6.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $4.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $2.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $2.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $1.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.80 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $33.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | $275.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $713.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $33.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | $275.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | $280.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | $293.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | $369.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | $416.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | $504.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | $572.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | $604.8M |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $713.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $672.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $644.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $633.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $612.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $598.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $588.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $582.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | 1.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $31.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $22.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 4.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | 0.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $168.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $53.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $91.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $81.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 3.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 152.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 8.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | 5.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 3.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
SENEB
| Canned Vegetables | $430.2M | 85% |
| Fruit | $34.6M | 7% |
| Frozen | $29.3M | 6% |
| Manufactured Product Other | $10.8M | 2% |
| Snack | $3.4M | 1% |
