vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.1× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 10.7%, a 37.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 7.6%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $31.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
ATMU vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
