vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmos Energy (ATO) and Polaris Inc. (PII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Polaris Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.2× Atmos Energy). Atmos Energy runs the higher net margin — 30.0% vs -2.8%, a 32.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmos Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 8.0%). Polaris Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-342.5M vs $-725.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Polaris Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-8.0% CAGR vs -9.7%).

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors, serving about three million natural gas distribution customers in over 1,400 communities in nine states from the Blue Ridge Mountains in the East to the Rocky Mountains in the West.

Polaris Inc. is an American automotive manufacturer headquartered in Medina, Minnesota, United States. Polaris was founded in Roseau, Minnesota, where it still has engineering and manufacturing facilities. The company manufactured motorcycles through its Victory Motorcycles subsidiary until January 2017, then produced motorcycles through the Indian Motorcycle subsidiary, which it purchased in April 2011 and announced its divestiture in October 2025. Polaris produced personal watercraft from 1...

ATO vs PII — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PII
PII
1.2× larger
PII
$1.7B
$1.3B
ATO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ATO
ATO
+6.2% gap
ATO
14.2%
8.0%
PII
Higher net margin
ATO
ATO
32.9% more per $
ATO
30.0%
-2.8%
PII
More free cash flow
PII
PII
$382.8M more FCF
PII
$-342.5M
$-725.3M
ATO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PII
PII
Annualised
PII
-8.0%
-9.7%
ATO

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Revenue
$1.3B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$403.0M
$-47.2M
Gross Margin
20.2%
Operating Margin
38.3%
76.5%
Net Margin
30.0%
-2.8%
Revenue YoY
14.2%
8.0%
Net Profit YoY
14.5%
29.0%
EPS (diluted)
$2.44
$-0.83

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$1.3B
$1.9B
Q3 25
$737.5M
$1.8B
Q2 25
$838.8M
$1.9B
Q1 25
$2.0B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$657.9M
$1.7B
Q2 24
$701.5M
$2.0B
Net Profit
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
$-47.2M
Q4 25
$403.0M
$-303.6M
Q3 25
$174.9M
$-15.8M
Q2 25
$186.4M
$-79.3M
Q1 25
$485.6M
$-66.8M
Q4 24
$351.9M
$10.6M
Q3 24
$134.0M
$27.7M
Q2 24
$165.6M
$68.7M
Gross Margin
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
20.2%
Q4 25
20.0%
Q3 25
20.7%
Q2 25
19.4%
Q1 25
60.0%
16.0%
Q4 24
80.1%
20.4%
Q3 24
20.6%
Q2 24
21.6%
Operating Margin
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
76.5%
Q4 25
38.3%
-16.7%
Q3 25
29.8%
1.1%
Q2 25
30.1%
-0.7%
Q1 25
32.2%
-2.4%
Q4 24
39.1%
3.7%
Q3 24
28.1%
3.8%
Q2 24
31.4%
6.1%
Net Margin
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
-2.8%
Q4 25
30.0%
-15.8%
Q3 25
23.7%
-0.9%
Q2 25
22.2%
-4.3%
Q1 25
24.9%
-4.3%
Q4 24
29.9%
0.6%
Q3 24
20.4%
1.6%
Q2 24
23.6%
3.5%
EPS (diluted)
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
$-0.83
Q4 25
$2.44
$-5.34
Q3 25
$1.04
$-0.28
Q2 25
$1.16
$-1.39
Q1 25
$3.03
$-1.17
Q4 24
$2.23
$0.18
Q3 24
$0.82
$0.49
Q2 24
$1.08
$1.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$367.0M
$282.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$14.3B
$750.4M
Total Assets
$29.8B
$5.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.67×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
$282.0M
Q4 25
$367.0M
$138.0M
Q3 25
$202.7M
$335.5M
Q2 25
$709.4M
$324.3M
Q1 25
$543.5M
$291.7M
Q4 24
$584.5M
$287.8M
Q3 24
$307.3M
$291.3M
Q2 24
$674.6M
$322.7M
Total Debt
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
Q4 25
$9.6B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$8.9B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$8.9B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$8.4B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$8.4B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$7.8B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$7.8B
$2.1B
Stockholders' Equity
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
$750.4M
Q4 25
$14.3B
$828.4M
Q3 25
$13.6B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$13.4B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$13.1B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$12.8B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$12.2B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$12.2B
$1.3B
Total Assets
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
$5.2B
Q4 25
$29.8B
$4.9B
Q3 25
$28.2B
$5.3B
Q2 25
$27.7B
$5.4B
Q1 25
$27.0B
$5.5B
Q4 24
$26.5B
$5.5B
Q3 24
$25.2B
$5.6B
Q2 24
$24.9B
$5.7B
Debt / Equity
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.67×
1.82×
Q3 25
0.66×
1.13×
Q2 25
0.67×
1.17×
Q1 25
0.64×
1.32×
Q4 24
0.66×
1.27×
Q3 24
0.64×
1.29×
Q2 24
0.64×
1.56×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$308.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-725.3M
$-342.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-54.0%
-20.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
77.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.76×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.6B
$168.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
Q4 25
$308.1M
$178.7M
Q3 25
$348.1M
$158.8M
Q2 25
$496.4M
$320.3M
Q1 25
$922.9M
$83.2M
Q4 24
$282.0M
$206.3M
Q3 24
$330.7M
$21.0M
Q2 24
$411.2M
$146.3M
Free Cash Flow
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
$-342.5M
Q4 25
$-725.3M
$114.0M
Q3 25
$-615.5M
$116.7M
Q2 25
$-370.6M
$279.8M
Q1 25
$83.3M
$47.6M
Q4 24
$-609.2M
$137.3M
Q3 24
$-477.3M
$-32.4M
Q2 24
$-302.4M
$79.1M
FCF Margin
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
-20.6%
Q4 25
-54.0%
5.9%
Q3 25
-83.5%
6.3%
Q2 25
-44.2%
15.1%
Q1 25
4.3%
3.1%
Q4 24
-51.8%
7.8%
Q3 24
-72.5%
-1.9%
Q2 24
-43.1%
4.0%
Capex Intensity
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
Q4 25
77.0%
3.4%
Q3 25
130.7%
2.3%
Q2 25
103.4%
2.2%
Q1 25
43.0%
2.3%
Q4 24
75.8%
3.9%
Q3 24
122.8%
3.1%
Q2 24
101.7%
3.4%
Cash Conversion
ATO
ATO
PII
PII
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.76×
Q3 25
1.99×
Q2 25
2.66×
Q1 25
1.90×
Q4 24
0.80×
19.46×
Q3 24
2.47×
0.76×
Q2 24
2.48×
2.13×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ATO
ATO

Distribution Segment$1.3B94%
Transportation Revenue$41.5M3%
Other$39.4M3%
Miscellaneous Revenue$2.8M0%

PII
PII

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons