vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atomera Inc (ATOM) and Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Youxin Technology Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4K vs $11.0K, roughly 3.6× Atomera Inc). Youxin Technology Ltd runs the higher net margin — -324.8% vs -50663.6%, a 50338.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Atomera Incorporated is a materials engineering company based in Los Gatos, California engaged in the development, commercialization and licensing of processes and technologies for the semiconductor industry. Atomera's research and development activities are focused on the development of Mears Silicon Technology (MST), a novel approach to the fabrication of semiconductor materials. MST is a scalable, high-performance, energy-efficient process technology that can be used to improve the perform...
Youxin Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive digital service provider. It operates used car trading platforms, offers new car sales support, auto financing referrals, and after-sales resource matching for consumers and auto industry participants across mainland China, focusing on optimizing vehicle transaction efficiency.
ATOM vs YAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.0K | $39.4K |
| Net Profit | $-5.6M | $-127.9K |
| Gross Margin | — | 67.9% |
| Operating Margin | -52663.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -50663.6% | -324.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -50.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.17 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $11.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $39.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $-127.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 67.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 86.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -52663.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -21818.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6430.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -27966.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -50663.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -324.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20886.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6056.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -26788.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.0M | $-374.6K |
| Total Assets | $21.9M | $132.2K |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $-374.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | $132.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $-88.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -30681.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 118.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-88.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -30681.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57608.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4402.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 118.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
