vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agape ATP Corp (ATPC) and ATIF Holdings Ltd (ZBAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agape ATP Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($399.1K vs $250.0K, roughly 1.6× ATIF Holdings Ltd). Agape ATP Corp runs the higher net margin — -94.4% vs -635.6%, a 541.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ATIF Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.0% vs 10.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Agape ATP Corp's revenue compounded faster (11.9% CAGR vs -8.7%).
ATIF Holdings Ltd is a professional business advisory service provider that mainly serves small and medium-sized enterprises across the Asia-Pacific region. It offers corporate strategic consulting, fundraising guidance, cross-border expansion support, and industry resource matching services for clients in technology, consumer goods, manufacturing and other key sectors.
ATPC vs ZBAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $399.1K | $250.0K |
| Net Profit | $-376.9K | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -325.2% | -75.6% |
| Net Margin | -94.4% | -635.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.9% | 25.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.4% | -96.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.76 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $399.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $370.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $465.5K | $250.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $289.0K | $200.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.3K | $270.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $313.0K | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.6K | $25.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-376.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-586.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-617.1K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-698.9K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-808.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-509.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-442.7K | $-807.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-709.7K | $-407.6K |
| Q4 25 | 58.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -325.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -162.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -136.8% | -75.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -249.2% | -175.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -235.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -165.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -144.9% | -260.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -227.1% | -2190.1% |
| Q4 25 | -94.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -158.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -132.6% | -635.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -241.8% | -951.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -224.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -141.4% | -403.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -222.7% | -1630.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.31 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $140.1K | $7.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.5M | $8.4M |
| Total Assets | $24.6M | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $140.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.7K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.0K | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.8K | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $139.2K |
| Q4 25 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $506.3K |
| Q4 25 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $2.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-208.3K | $-939.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-208.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-256.7K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-494.5K | $-939.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-395.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-645.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-424.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-412.5K | $-62.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-212.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-213.5K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -854.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
