vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APTARGROUP, INC. (ATR) and KELLY SERVICES INC (KELYA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KELLY SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $982.9M, roughly 1.2× APTARGROUP, INC.). On growth, APTARGROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs -3.3%). APTARGROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($53.3M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, APTARGROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs -3.1%).
AptarGroup, Inc., also known as Aptar, is a United States–based global manufacturer of consumer dispensing packaging and drug delivery devices. The group has manufacturing operations in 18 countries.
Kelly Services, Inc. is an American multinational office staffing company. The company places employees at all levels in various sectors including financial services, information technology, and law. Also, its professional services include human resource and management consulting, outsourcing, recruitment, career transition, and vendor management. Kelly Services was founded by William Russell Kelly in 1946 and is headquartered in Troy, Michigan.
ATR vs KELYA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $982.9M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $72.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | -4.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | -3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | $-0.86 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $982.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $962.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $961.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $887.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $848.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $909.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.1M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $800.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $4.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.2% |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.92 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.48 | $-0.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $229.5M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $239.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $229.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $409.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.2M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.9M | $38.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.1M | $239.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $822.7M | $228.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $210.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $15.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $53.3M | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | 1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $327.0M | $15.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.3M | $-20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.6M | $57.7M |
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.7M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | $54.7M |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | -25.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 12.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATR
Segment breakdown not available.
KELYA
| Science Engineering Technology | $295.8M | 25% |
| Education | $293.1M | 25% |
| Staffing Services | $237.7M | 20% |
| Other | $138.8M | 12% |
| Talent Solutions | $120.5M | 10% |
| Outcome Based Services | $103.6M | 9% |
| Permanent Placement | $1.6M | 0% |
