vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APTARGROUP, INC. (ATR) and Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APTARGROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($982.9M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.8× Mobileye Global Inc.). On growth, Mobileye Global Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.4% vs 10.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Mobileye Global Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs 3.9%).
AptarGroup, Inc., also known as Aptar, is a United States–based global manufacturer of consumer dispensing packaging and drug delivery devices. The group has manufacturing operations in 18 countries.
Mobileye Global Inc. is a United States-domiciled, Israel-headquartered autonomous driving company. It is developing self-driving technologies and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) including cameras, computer chips, and software. Mobileye was acquired by Intel in 2017 and went public again in 2022.
ATR vs MBLY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $982.9M | $558.0M |
| Net Profit | $72.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | -647.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | 27.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $982.9M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $962.7M | $446.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $961.1M | $504.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $887.3M | $438.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $848.1M | $490.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $909.3M | $486.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.1M | $439.0M |
| Q1 26 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.3M | $-127.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.9M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $-102.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $-71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $-86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.6% |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | -647.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | -21.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | -14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | -17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -577.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | -21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | -28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | -23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | -558.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.92 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.67 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.17 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.48 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $229.5M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $8.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $229.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $409.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.9M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $822.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $14.7B |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $12.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $15.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $75.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $53.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $327.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $113.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.6M | $167.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $109.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.2M | $204.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.3M | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.6M | $30.0M |
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.9M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | $143.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.5M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.9M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $191.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.7M | $104.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | $6.0M |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
