vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APTARGROUP, INC. (ATR) and North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APTARGROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($982.9M vs $860.2M, roughly 1.1× North American Construction Group Ltd.). APTARGROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs 4.7%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, North American Construction Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (58.0% CAGR vs 3.9%).
AptarGroup, Inc., also known as Aptar, is a United States–based global manufacturer of consumer dispensing packaging and drug delivery devices. The group has manufacturing operations in 18 countries.
Shanghai Construction (Group) Corporation (SCG) is a Chinese construction and engineering company, ranked as the 16th largest construction company in the world based on 2011 revenues.
ATR vs NOA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $982.9M | $860.2M |
| Net Profit | $72.8M | $40.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $982.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $962.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $961.1M | $860.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.0M | $573.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $887.3M | $297.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $848.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $909.3M | $636.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.1M | $439.5M |
| Q1 26 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.9M | $40.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $34.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.92 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $229.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $229.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $409.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $822.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $140.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $53.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $327.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.6M | $140.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.0M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.3M | $109.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.6M | $72.0M |
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 2.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.