vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APTARGROUP, INC. (ATR) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APTARGROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($982.9M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.9× TIC Solutions, Inc.). APTARGROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -9.3%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. APTARGROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($53.3M vs $37.1M).
AptarGroup, Inc., also known as Aptar, is a United States–based global manufacturer of consumer dispensing packaging and drug delivery devices. The group has manufacturing operations in 18 countries.
ATR vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $982.9M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $72.8M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $982.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $962.7M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $961.1M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.0M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $887.3M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $848.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $909.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.3M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.9M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.92 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $229.5M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $229.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $409.5M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.8M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.8M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.1M | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.2M | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $822.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $53.3M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $327.0M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.9M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.5M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.9M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATR
Segment breakdown not available.
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
